After twenty years in congress, Curt Weldon was about to become chairman of the House Armed Services Committee when he publicly questioned the accuracy of the 9-11 report. In retaliation, the Bush administration sent federal agents to his daughter’s house and ended his political career.
At 77, Weldon has decided to tell the truth about what actually happened on September 11, 2001.
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
Some Comments On TheConservativeTreeHouse.com
9/11 had several main objectives.
It gave the Green Light for the enactment of the “Patriot Act” which was most likely sitting in draft form on Poppy Bush’s Desk in 1990.
It gave the US an avenue to build a massive military base in the ME, with Iraq as it’s main target, and Halliburton would “Receive” the contracts.
It allowed for the Destruction of several buildings which housed evidence of Government Financial Corruption/Theft (Think Building 7, the precise locations of WTC & Pentagon Impacts)
.
To get boots on the ground in Afghanistan for the sole purpose of protecting the Poppy Fields
(The CIA’s main source of $$$, and a nod to Bush Sr’s Nickname “Poppy”)
________________________________________________________________________
Tucker Carlson begins his recent interview with Alex Jones with a remarkable observation: not only was Jones the only one to “call 9/11 before it happened” – but also said mere months before the September 11th attacks that “the CIA” would be behind them.
“You’re the only guy who predicted it in public – and nobody calls you. Then they set about trying to destroy you,” Carlson says. “I think there’s a connection between those two facts.”
As this two hour exchange shows, there is plenty besides Jones’ 9/11 prediction which may lead his enemies to seek his destruction. A deep dive into the globalist policies of war, its anti-Christian mission and the nightmare future pursued by global elites resolves into a message of hope. The global system is dissolving, says Jones, and the efforts of the enemies of the truth have failed to suppress it.
Why the feds want to ‘get’ Alex Jones
Jones agrees with Carlson, saying he had been documenting the “hundreds and hundreds of examples of our government” carrying out similar operations – such as in Iran and South America. Then Jones, in April 2002, announced that the World Trade Center would be attacked – “and they would pin it on Bin Laden.”
Carlson adds: “That’s the most amazing fact I have ever heard: you called 9/11 and no investigator ever called to ask how you knew that.”
That Bin Laden was a “western intelligence” asset, explains Jones, was well known at the time. What was less well known was that another CIA asset – this time from Egypt – had been tasked with bombing the World Trade Center in the 1990s. With this precedent in place, Jones concluded that the “new Pearl Harbor” suggested by neocons like Dick Cheney would most likely be an attack on the World Trade Center using the CIA asset Osama Bin Laden.
“Is this why the feds want to destroy you?” Carlson asks Jones, “because you have been saying the foundations of our system are basically rotten?”
_______________________________________________________________________
My Comment:
Towers were taken out by preplanted detonations from the top down.
9-11 was a setup or ploy to be the catalyist to the police state we live in today.
________________________________________________________________________
60 Structural Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Demolition
Impossible Collapse Acceleration
After NIST characterized the Twin Towers’ collapse as “essentially in free fall” (See Section 6.14.4 of NIST NCSTAR 1, page 146 [PDF page 196]), Brookman wrote to NIST investigators, asking why debris fell “with little or no resistance from the intact structure below.”
And, though Rice didn’t address NIST directly, he, too, questioned — and continues to question — how each tower “inexplicably collapsed upon itself, crushing all 287 columns on each floor, while maintaining near-free-fall acceleration, as if the 80,000 tons of supporting structural steel framework underneath didn’t exist.”
Falling objects, notes Pasternack, should take “the path of least resistance,” yet official explanations claim that tower debris took the path of greatest resistance, through the strong core structure all the way to the ground.
The Twin Towers were overbuilt to prevent office workers from getting seasick on windy days, says Kollar. “There’s so much redundancy. . . . The building has to be stiff enough so it doesn’t sway [excessively].” Perimeter columns designed to endure hurricanes, Scott says, were loaded only to “about 10% of their ultimate capacity” in the gentle breeze on 9/11. (See “How Columns Will Be Designed for 110-Story Buildings,” Engineering News-Record, April 2, 1964.)
Gravity was “a negligible part of the loading,” says Kollar, citing a claim by the Twin Towers’ engineers Worthington, Skilling, Helle & Jackson that even with all the columns on one side — and several around the two corners — cut, each tower would still withstand 100 mile-per-hour winds. (See James Glanz and Eric Lipton, City in the Sky: The Rise and Fall of the World Trade Center, New York: Times Books, 2003.)
The rapid breakup of these robust structures appears to defy the laws of physics, AE911Truth engineers say. Fifty years of structural design experience inform the view of Santa Rosa, California, licensed structural engineer Bob Briscoe, P.E., who maintains that the government’s collapse theories “defy the laws of mechanics, conservation of energy, and known structural failure behavior.”
In the official collapse story, the kinetic energy (of motion) of the falling debris would have been largely absorbed by the existing structure, bending and twisting steel components, and breaking up 220 acres of concrete floors. To accomplish all this while achieving a nearly free-fall collapse is “simply not physically possible,” says Mason. “There is not sufficient energy available . . . . For this massively strong structure to just crumble away at near-free-fall acceleration would have required immense amounts of explosive energy.”
_______________________________________________________________________
We saw no “raging infernos” on TV, notes David Huebner, P.E., a licensed structural engineer in Michigan. On the contrary, sooty smoke and dull red flames indicate “cool fires . . . fuel-starved fires,” says Scott.
He adds that firefighters working at the 78th-floor impact zone reported “only two small fires, not the 1,000-degree-Centigrade inferno” that government officials claim.
New York Fire Department (FDNY) personnel, trained to assess fires’ structural hazards, had no reason to expect total collapse, Brookman maintains.
In fact, Scott notes, several steel-framed towers have burned longer, hotter, and much more intensely without collapse. “As engineers, we know what fire can do to steel and what it can’t.”
“Over 100 recorded witnesses reported hearing and seeing multiple explosions,” Rice recalls.
Brookman, too, cites “numerous eyewitness accounts, including the FDNY oral histories, of secondary explosions . . . well below the impact floors.” His letter to congressional representatives describes “explosive clouds of dust and debris moving horizontally and vertically.” “That does not look anything like a heat-induced, gravitational collapse mechanism,” Brookman writes. Rice, noting that “perimeter columns weighing several tons each were ejected laterally up to [600] feet,” contends that this phenomenon is “not possible without explosives.”
_______________________________________________________________________
Angular Momentum Arrested
As the South Tower began to fail, the top 29 stories tipped as a unit, photos show. “The tilting block doesn’t look right,” Brookman asserts.
It should “continue to rotate and fall to the ground.” Phoenix, Arizona, licensed structural engineer Edward Knesl, S.E., and Lomba echo Brookman.
The failure mode of such tall structures should have been “a fall over to the side” (Knesl) and “a toppling of the upper floors to one side, . . . not a concentric, vertical collapse” (Lomba).
“It looked like an explosive event,” adds Brookman. “[The upper section] began tilting toward the damage zone, and then suddenly dropped straight down and disintegrated in the process.”
Captain Convey Comment
Curt Weldon knows the truth.
Firefighters know the truth.
The twin towers were destroyed by demolition – not controlled demolition which is different.
Building 7 was also destroyed by demolition.
The 2 planes did impact the twin towers but they didn’t make it collapse
like in a demolition style.
911 was a setup by the intel agencies to deceive America.
You can ignore 3,000 structural engineers and continue to believe the BIG LIE about 9-11.
Firefighters know the truth and have told the truth about the twin towers.